A Nervous System-Forward Approach to Facilitation (Part 2 of 3)
Written By Teddy McGlynn-Wright and Kirsten Harris-Talley of In The Works, Edited by Sylvia G. Hadnot of Has Everything & Co.
In group facilitation, we often say that we “bring ease” to the process. Deriving from the Latin root facilis "easy to do, we shouldn’t be surprised when there’s an unspoken expectation that things should stay smooth and easy when we bring folks together; it’s right there in the name! We work to keep it calm. Unruffled. But here’s the reality: ease doesn't always mean comfortable, and regulation is not the same as stasis or sameness. And, authentic and intense emotions doesn’t automatically mean something is wrong or unregulated.
The nervous system is built to detect and respond to threat, but it’s also built to stretch, to widen, to transform our response to the energy and circumstances we find ourselves in. Facilitators who equate regulation with stillness or being easy (instead of easeful) may miss the magic (and necessity) of emotional movement, especially in spaces where deep truth, healing, or liberation is on the table.
When you roll with the group’s needs and growth - ease ain’t always easy!
This post builds on A Nervous System-Forward Approach-Part 1, where we explored how group dynamics are shaped by nervous system states, whether or not we name them. Now, we’re diving into a key nuance: how to recognize the difference between actual dysregulation and necessary discomfort—and how to support both.
What Dysregulation Actually Is
Let’s get specific. Dysregulation is not just “having big feelings.” It’s what happens when the body moves outside of its window of capacity (or window of tolerance). That is, when a person (or group) becomes so overwhelmed that connection and choice are no longer available.
Think:
A group freezes and goes silent after a charged comment.
Someone lashes out or interrupts repeatedly, unable to hear others.
One participant has a “couldn’t care less” attitude, and a subtle wave of checked-out and confused energy spreads through the room.
These are cues that something might be flooding (overwhelming) the collective nervous system.
But contrast that with:
A tearful reflection after a powerful prompt.
Raised voices in a passionate, values-driven conversation.
A generative silence as a group metabolizes something real and processes before deciding what do to next.
These aren’t necessarily signs of dysregulation,or dis-ease. They just might be signs of connectedness. As facilitators we need to understand that the motivation and potential of where a group can take action has be to considered in how we respond and guide the group through big ahas and oops moments. These times when the energy shifts are when the group and the collective nervous system needs us most.
Read the Room; Adjust Accordingly
As facilitators, we have to become fluent in what regulation looks and feels like—not just in ourselves, but across a group body. We have to assess how both are informing what is happening and what is possible as a next step. In the words of Amanda Litman, be the thermostat, not the thermometer.
This includes:
Tracking nonverbal cues (breath, posture, tone, physical postures)
Understanding and disrupting patterns that are not serving the group in acceptance and knowing how to move forward (e.g. does this group avoid conflict? Gently turn them toward it. Do they over-intellectualize emotion? Give them the language of sensation and emotional expression
Noticing our own reactivity and how it is helping / hindering us as facilitators bringing ease to a moment of growth (are we tensing up because of discomfort or a true signal of danger? how do we plan accordingly once we know which is happening?)
This is particularly important when facilitating multiracial and cross-cultural groups. Emotional expression has been disproportionately pathologized for Black, Brown, and Indigenous folks, especially when that expression challenges dominant norms around “politeness” or “professionalism.” Norms that have been defined by oppression and assimilation from othering. The resulting emotional repression robs a group of crucial energy, clarity, and ability to take actions to move through a challenge or toward a goal. As facilitators, our role is to make sure the group can move with care, even when the experience is uncomfortable and outcomes uncertain.
Let’s be clear: Intensity does not mean something is wrong. Facilitators that can hold the flow of the group from calm to intense and back again helps the group stay within the threshold of growth and maintain a baseline integration, not disintegration. Regulation includes a spectrum of emotions, feelings, and differences simultaneously.--it’s about being present and expressive without doing harm to the group members or collective process. Intensity can actually serve the group in those goals.
Plan for Rupture. Practice Repair. Revisit again and again.
Even with the best intentions, rupture happens.
Voices crack. Understanding fractures. Relationships falter.
That’s not failure—it’s the work, which is always in the works. Because we change in a back-and-forth, rupture and repair is to be expected. Somatic (felt) change—the real kind—requires moments of contraction and expansion. Pause and action. Push and pull.
Instead of fearing rupture, we expect it. We prepare recipes of reintegration and strategies for care into our facilitation plans from the start. The recipe includes understanding the sensations that rupture and repair tell our bodies, naming easy and hard things, coming together to create solutions that can help and hold all the folks in the group - not just those who want things to stay the same. Without rupture there is often not catalyst to change things. Without repair, a group doesn’t get practice at integrating differences and relationships into new and exciting ways of being. The role that rupture and repair have in helping individuals and groups practice change are immeasurable and essential.
The core need of regulation is for connection - and the more disconnected the group is, the more intensity that will surface to bridge to connecting again.
This means:
Naming ahead of time that moments of tension will arise, reminding folks that discomfort does not always mean danger.
Building co-facilitation agreements for when one facilitator needs to step out or ground
Building a mixture large group, small group, and solo activities when intensity shows us what needs extra time and intention to get to repair
Deciding how we will come back into alignment after the group agreements are inevitably broken.
Start Today / Build Over Time
Start Today:
Practice noticing when there is too much, too little, and just the right amount of intensity.
When group tension arises, pause and reflect: is this discomfort productive?
Normalize post-tension check-ins as part of your session rhythm
Build Over Time:
Embed support for emotional expression (rituals, journaling, creative outlets)
Train your team in trauma-informed principles
Develop co-facilitation protocols for mid-session course corrections